|
Re: Re: kprobes: msg#00196linux.vserver
> I've been monitoring the kprobes project for some > time now, and it really is interesting, especially > as the code required for each arch is very small > > > maybe that could be _real_ useful for the vserver project ? :-) > > yeah, it probably could, especially for hunting > down nasty stuff on a real system ... > > do you have any specific kernel debugging case in > mind here? not directly... i just wanted to let you (and others) know about that project in case you don't already :-). i haven't had time yet to fully check it out, but thought it might be useful for debugging various stuff. (i.e. quota, limitations(cpu, mem), ...) -- regards, Georges Toth _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list Vserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: kprobes: 00196, Herbert Poetzl |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Re: kprobes: 00196, Herbert Poetzl |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: kprobesi: 00196, Herbert Poetzl |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re: kprobes: 00196, Herbert Poetzl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |