On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 15:52 +1000, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 August 2006 15:42, William Anderson <neuro at well.com> wrote:
> > Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > The GNOME and KDE teams have agreed on some conventions regarding the
> > > "Trash" moniker:
> > >
> > > " Trash should be translated to Wastebin when referring to the
> > > desktop/file manager. Other situations can use either 'Wastebin' or
> > > 'Deleted Items' as seems most appropriate (KMail uses Deleted Items).
> > > Beware of Trash being used as a verb which should be translated as 'Move
> > > to Wastebin'. "
> > >
> > > Their respective home pages are at:
> > > http://live.gnome.org/BritishEnglish
> > > http://kde.me.uk/index.php?page=kde-en-gb
> >
> > You've quoted the KDE version; the GNOME page states "Wastebasket", not
> > "Wastebin". Can we influence these upstreams in any way about our Deleted
> > Items thinking? I can certainly ping Jonathan Riddell and see what he
> > thinks.
>
> Whoops! Thanks for pointing that out. On a quick glance, the paragraphs
> looked
> identical. I didn't notice the Wastebin/Wastebasket distinction.
>
> I definitely would like to move such a change upstream. I don't see any point
> in GNOME and KDE using different names for the same thing.
Also I think that this would be good for consistency. Even in different
DEs, I believe that the term should be the same.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-l10n-eng/attachments/20060829/c195f52e/attachment.pgp
|
