logo       
Google Custom Search
    AddThis Social Bookmark Button
<prev   next>
-->

Re: Upgrade but already running?: msg#00033

Subject: Re: Upgrade but already running? 
Michael Hipp wrote:

> Are my eyes deceiving me or does this say it's going to upgrade my kernel to 
> the one I'm already running (2.6.15-28-server)?

In ideal world, we would never change ABI revision (28 in this case). 
Luckily, this time upgrade fits in that ideal world :)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Upgrade but already running?, Mathias Gug
Next by Date:  HP Blades, apellido nombre
Previous by Thread:  Re: Upgrade but already running?, Mathias Gug
Next by Thread:  HP Blades, apellido nombre
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

    ^^^ ADDITIONAL NAVIGATION ^^^

  
Google Custom Search

Recently Viewed:
user-groups.lin...    emacs.w3m/2002-...    db.postgresql.d...    yellowdog.gener...    gnome.evolution...    redhat.release....    java.servicemix...    text.doxygen.ge...    org.user-groups...    politics.oekonu...    misc.free-softw...    qnx.openqnx.dev...    netbsd.general/...    systems.sam-cou...    ietf.mipshop/20...    kde.extra-gear/...    xfce.user/2003-...    freebsd.italian...    altlinux.sysadm...    linux.hardware....    version-control...    bbc.general/200...    web.opera.gener...    horde.sork/2003...    culture.region....   
Home | blog view | USPTO Patent Archive (NEW!) | advertise | OSDir is an inevitable website. super tiny logo