|
Re: [PATCH] tty: preparatory structures for termios revamp: msg#00037linux.serial
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 18:39 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > In order to sort out our struct termios and add proper speed control we > need to separate the kernel and user termios structures. Glibc is fine > but the other libraries rely on the kernel exported struct termios and > we need to extend this without breaking the ABI/API > > To do so we add a struct ktermios which is the kernel view of a termios > structure and overlaps the struct termios with extra fields on the end > for now. (That limitation will go away in later patches). Some platforms > (eg alpha) planned ahead and thus use the same struct for both, others > did not. > > > This just adds the structures but does not use them, it seems a sensible > splitting point for bisect if there are compile failures (not that I > expect them) Why have separate copies of almost identical structures in each architecture -- can we not put the new structure in asm-generic/termbits.h and use that for all but SPARC, which has the extra _x_cc field? -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH 1/2] tty: switch to ktermios and new framework: 00037, Alan Cox |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC][PATCH] Xilinx uartlite serial driver: 00037, Olof Johansson |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] tty: preparatory structures for termios revampi: 00037, Alan Cox |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 1/2] tty: switch to ktermios and new framework: 00037, Alan Cox |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |