logo       

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Xilinx uartlite serial driver: msg#00005

linux.serial

Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Xilinx uartlite serial driver

>>>>> "David" == David H Lynch <dhlii@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Sorry for the delay, I've been ill..

David> There is more than one UartLite driver. I have one from someone
David> else that includes DCR support.
David> I wrote one that includes early boot console support - which is
David> fairly trivial.

Yes, I know (after writing mine). That's why getting the driver
mainline is important, otherwise people will keep on reinventing the
wheel..

David> I will try to separate out my early boot console patches - would
David> this be the appropriate place to post them ?

Yes, presumably once the base driver goes in.

David> I beleive my driver is the one Peter believes is broken.

Me? I don't even think I ever tried your driver..

David> I can't quite understand why one would build a Xilinx FPGA with
both.

We have done it several times. 16550s for when you need full
functionality (changeable baudrate, control lines, ..) and uartlites
for dedicated links.

David> If Peter's driver is likely to get accepted I have all of the
David> platform device code done for my own driver I can move it to his.
David> I did a BSP for the Pico E12/E14, they use either UartLite out of
David> the box, or a pseudo serial device they call the Keyhole
David> that can be used if the E12/E14 are hosted (they are CF/Cardbus
David> cards respectively)

Ok, but where would you add it? The ML300/403 boards are afaik the
only ones in mainline.

--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise