Re: linux 2.4.20-pre?-ac? kernels

On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 05:50:16PM +0300, Ariel Biener wrote:

>    Has anyone had problems with them in production servers (with emphasis
> on networking and IO, using 1GB of memory on a dual pIII
> architecture).

Unless you have to, why would you want to go with a prerelease kernel?
If you have to, does it matter what problems they have?

To be specific, 2.4.20-pre seem very stable (judging only by trafic on
lkml, very little actual usage), 2.4.20-pre-ac have experimental IDE
work in them, not what I'd consider production material in any way
shape or form. Why don't you use the vendor's kernels? For production
use, that's definitely the safest bet. 
-- 
Muli Ben-Yehuda                                 http://www.mulix.org/   
mulix-BzGcCpaT2IbYtjvyW6yDsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:~$ sctrace strace /bin/foo        
http://syscalltrack.sf.net/
Quis custodes ipsos custodiet?

pgp8zyR94HQpR.pgp
Description: PGP signature