logo       

Re: Re: [CentOS-devel] Too many kernels?: msg#00030

linux.redhat.release.rhel5

Subject: Re: Re: [CentOS-devel] Too many kernels?

On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 07:16:12PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:

> what is wrong with the CentOS policy ?
>
> I dont see any harm in removing from the main repo's kernels which are
> now known to have issues and exploits. Besides, we still maintain the
> full compliment of all kernels and updates released within the point
> release, as well the centosplus kernels and updated fixed kernels for
> issues that people are facing at the moment.

It's not about kernels only, it's about all packages.

IMHO all packages that are ever released for a certain OS version (say
CentOS 5) should stay online (with the corresponding src.rpm's) for
support reasons. This is not related to the package's quality or the
fact that nobody should run those old packages.

Now, AFAICS now this is done at vault.centos.org, so it's not that bad,
but it would be better if it was just in the main tree, kept on all
mirrors.

Having said this, I agree that the amount of data grows quite fast and
that mirrors might not want to carry it all, data that is mostly there
for reference and won't be downloaded very often.

--
-- Jos Vos <jos-kr6OmwynPFk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364
-- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise