|
Re: Too many kernels?: msg#00021linux.redhat.release.rhel5
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I start to think whether these kernels are indeed being all used to > the extend of justifying full kmdl support. Maybe it would make sense > to keep the full last series (2.6.18-92* above) and the highest one > from the series before (2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 and 2.6.18-8.1.15.el5). Eek, that's a lot of rebuilds. Yes, I think your suggested policy sounds fine to me as generally it's a good idea to keep on the latest kernel as usually they are either bugfix or security fix updates. -Dave |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Too many kernels?: 00021, Axel Thimm |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Re: [CentOS-devel] Too many kernels?: 00021, Karanbir Singh |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: [CentOS-devel] Too many kernels?i: 00021, Jarod Wilson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re: [ATrpms-users] Too many kernels?: 00021, Joshua Daniel Franklin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |