xen-unstable => 3.2, binary packages

We hope to be releasing upstream Xen 3.2 soon.  As you'll know, we've
been in the habit of producing binary packages for our releases,
including for Fedora.

It seemed to me that the best approach would be, where possible, to
use a distro's own packaging setup.  That would be more likely to
generate packages which integrate well with the distro and behave more
like the distro's own Xen packaging arrangements.

I haven't looked at the FC6 srpm in detail yet but what would you
think about it if we were to generate our 3.2 binary rpms based on
that ?

Regards,
Ian.