Bill Nottingham wrote:
Gene C. (czar@xxxxxxxxx) said:
There seems to be this desire to put oddball version/release identifiers for
packages. First, in FC2-T1 there was util-linux 2.12pre-3 being updated with
2.12-4 but rpm and up2date consider the older package to be newer.
Hm, the first one really shouldn't have been named XXpre. That's
a beta release, though, so, what's done is done. We'll try and avoid
that in the future.
Now, for
FC1 the recent update for tcpdump has 3.7.2-7.1 being updated by
3/7/2-7.fc1.1 but (again) the older packages is considered newer (and the
same is true for libpcap 0.7.2-7.1 being updated by 0.7.2-7.fc1.1).
That's a bug. Please put this in bugzilla.
and for the announced "fedora core 1 security-fix " ??
tcpdump, libpcap, arpwatch
i had no time to file a bug, i recognized it ~ 3 hours later
the message to the annouce-list was being held
an email to harald was send.
than i had to go to work, to late
--
shrek-m
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
|
