On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 22:40 -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> One thing of note, is we seem to have settled into a NAME-dssi naming
> convention for DSSI plugins. Seems technically inconsistent but I
> suppose the difference is ladspa packages usually contain a whole bunch
> of plugins, whereas a dssi plugin tends to be just one.
It should be dssi-NAME
The reverse is more difficult to search in a list of packages, or simply
when you do an 'ls' in a directory.
It's just common sense, the least specific denominator must come first,
as in the YYYYMMDD format which preserves the order.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
|
