Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 23:37:32 -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
Does nobody else see this as a horribly hypocritical? If Red Hat is
serious about enforcing this rule, then first mandate it on Core to lead
by example.
+1
<AOL>
Me too
</AOL>
Then everyone is forced to discuss the technical annoyances
like below:
How are we supposed to deal with cases where the source did not ship a
full copy of the license in order to add to %doc easily? We are
supposed to add another copy of the license to each SRPM?
Do we have examples for this? (other than a missing GPL "COPYING" file)
It's very common for both the GPL and Artistic license texts not to be
shipped with perl modules that use the same license as perl (i.e. dual
GPL/Artistic).
Paul.
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
| 
