Re: libtool(.la) archive policy proposal

Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:

> You should probably also mention /etc/ld.so.conf.d. 

Since that's (should be!) already referenced in /etc/ld.so.conf, I figured
it didn't need to be explictly mentioned.  Maybe I was being too
optimistic.

> I hope it's not 
> necessary to note specifically that a package can't have .la files in
> directories that it adds to the ld search path.

I hope that too. (:

-- Rex