|
|
August 29, 2006
- Re: Re: RFC: Creating meta group packages via comps, Jack Neely
- Re: RFC: Creating meta group packages via comps, seth vidal
- Re: RFC: Creating meta group packages via comps, Jeremy Katz
- Re: RFC: Creating meta group packages via comps, Jesse Keating
- Re: RFC: Creating meta group packages via comps, seth vidal
- Re: RFC: Creating meta group packages via comps, Bill Nottingham
- Re: RFC: Creating meta group packages via comps, seth vidal
- Re: RFC: Creating meta group packages via comps, Bill Nottingham
- Re: Re: RFC: Creating meta group packages via comps, José Matos
- Re: RFC: Creating meta group packages via comps, Jesse Keating
- Re: RFC: Creating meta group packages via comps, Christopher Stone
- Re: RFC: Creating meta group packages via comps, Christopher Stone
- Re: RFC: Creating meta group packages via comps, Jeremy Katz
- Re: RFC: Creating meta group packages via comps, Jesse Keating
- Re: RFC: Creating meta group packages via comps, seth vidal
- Re: RFC: Creating meta group packages via comps, Michael J. Knox
- Re: RFC: Creating meta group packages via comps, Christopher Stone
- Re: RFC: Creating meta group packages via comps, seth vidal
- RFC: Creating meta group packages via comps, Christopher Stone
- Re: New Meeting Time, Ralf Corsepius
August 23, 2006
- Re: GConf snippets suggestion, Yanko Kaneti
- Re: Packaging/Guidelines - Usage of %{optflags}, Till Maas
- Re: Absolute symlinks, Ville Skyttä
- Re: Packaging/Guidelines - Usage of %{optflags}, Ville Skyttä
- Re: GConf snippets suggestion, Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: Packaging/Guidelines - Usage of %{optflags}, Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: Packaging/Guidelines - Usage of %{optflags}, Axel Thimm
- Re: Re: Packaging/Guidelines - Usage of %{optflags}, Till Maas
- Re: Packaging/Guidelines - Usage of %{optflags}, Axel Thimm
- Packaging/Guidelines - Usage of %{optflags}, Till Maas
August 22, 2006
- Re: Absolute symlinks, Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: Absolute symlinks, Axel Thimm
- Re: Re: Absolute symlinks, Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: Absolute symlinks, Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Absolute symlinks, Axel Thimm
- Re: Absolute symlinks, Axel Thimm
- Re: Absolute symlinks, Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Axel Thimm
- Re: Re: Absolute symlinks, Rex Dieter
- Re: Absolute symlinks, Axel Thimm
- Re: Absolute symlinks, Rex Dieter
- Re: Absolute symlinks, Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Re: Absolute symlinks, Rex Dieter
- Re: Re: Absolute symlinks, PFJ
- Re: Absolute symlinks, Rex Dieter
- Re: Absolute symlinks, PFJ
- Re: Absolute symlinks, Rex Dieter
- Absolute symlinks, Jason L Tibbitts III
August 19, 2006
- Re: rpm -i, "missing" file conflicts and brokenness with kmods, Axel Thimm
- Re: rpm -i, "missing" file conflicts and brokenness with kmods, Rex Dieter
- Re: rpm -i, "missing" file conflicts and brokenness with kmods, Jack Neely
- Re: rpm -i, "missing" file conflicts and brokenness with kmods, Axel Thimm
- Re: kmdls: very good support for custom kernels (was: kernel-module packaging discussing ...), Axel Thimm
- Re: Re: rpm -i, "missing" file conflicts and brokenness with kmods, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Re: kmdls: very good support for custom kernels (was: kernel-module packaging discussing ...), Thorsten Leemhuis
- Complaints about censoring and kmdl IRC session (resend), Axel Thimm
- Re: rpm -i, "missing" file conflicts and brokenness with kmods, Axel Thimm
- Re: Re: rpm -i, "missing" file conflicts and brokenness with kmods, Bill Nottingham
- Re: Re: rpm -i, "missing" file conflicts and brokenness with kmods, Bill Nottingham
- Re: rpm -i, "missing" file conflicts and brokenness with kmods, Axel Thimm
- file-conflicts on updates problem, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: rpm -i, "missing" file conflicts and brokenness with kmods, seth vidal
- rpm -i, "missing" file conflicts and brokenness with kmods, Axel Thimm
August 18, 2006
- RESEND: REPORT: IRC meeting to discuss kernel module packaging, Jon Masters
- Complaints about censoring and kmdl IRC session, Axel Thimm
- Importance of debuginfo packages, Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Python submodule naming, Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Axel Thimm
- Re: %makeinstall - must not or should not use it?, Jesse Keating
- Re: kmdls: very good support for custom kernels (was: kernel-module packaging discussing ...), Axel Thimm
- Re: Python submodule naming, Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: %makeinstall - must not or should not use it?, Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Python submodule naming, Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: %makeinstall - must not or should not use it?, Rex Dieter
- Re: %makeinstall - must not or should not use it?, Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: %makeinstall - must not or should not use it?, Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: %makeinstall - must not or should not use it?, Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Jon Masters
- Re: %makeinstall - must not or should not use it?, Matthew Miller
- Re: %makeinstall - must not or should not use it?, Paul Howarth
- Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Jon Masters
- Re: %makeinstall - must not or should not use it?, Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: %makeinstall - must not or should not use it?, Paul Howarth
- Re: Do we need a Rule "Docs should be packaged as %doc"?, Till Maas
- Re: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs, Ville Skyttä
- %makeinstall - must not or should not use it?, Till Maas
- Re: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs, Parag N(पराग़)
- Re: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs, Jesse Keating
- Re: Re: kmdls: very good support for custom kernels (was: kernel-module packaging discussing ...), Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Friday 1PM EDT IRC Meeting, Jesse Keating
- Re: kmdls: very good support for custom kernels (was: kernel-module packaging discussing ...), Axel Thimm
- Re: kernel-module packaging discussing broken into pieces: One specfile approach vs. splitted spec file, Axel Thimm
- Re: Re: kmdls: very good support for custom kernels (was: kernel-module packaging discussing ...), Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: kmdls: very good support for custom kernels (was: kernel-module packaging discussing ...), Axel Thimm
- Re: kmdls: very good support for custom kernels (was: kernel-module packaging discussing ...), Axel Thimm
- Re: Re: kmdls: very good support for custom kernels (was: kernel-module packaging discussing ...), Ville Skyttä
- Re: kmod: $1 in %post and firends broken (was: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference), Axel Thimm
- Re: Re: kmdls: very good support for custom kernels (was: kernel-module packaging discussing ...), Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: kmdls: very good support for custom kernels (was: kernel-module packaging discussing ...), Axel Thimm
- Re: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs, Ville Skyttä
- Re: kmod: $1 in %post and firends broken (was: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference), Ville Skyttä
- Re: kmdls: very good support for custom kernels (was: kernel-module packaging discussing ...), Ville Skyttä
- Friday 1PM EDT IRC Meeting, Warren Togami
- mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs, Jason L Tibbitts III
August 17, 2006
- Re: The .pc and pkgconfig issue, Jesse Keating
- Re: The .pc and pkgconfig issue, Christopher Stone
- Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Jack Neely
- Re: The .pc and pkgconfig issue, Jesse Keating
- Re: The .pc and pkgconfig issue, Rex Dieter
- kmod: $1 in %post and firends broken (was: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference), Axel Thimm
- kmdls: very good support for custom kernels (was: kernel-module packaging discussing ...), Axel Thimm
- flexibility of kmdl interface (was: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference), Axel Thimm
- OT: xen vs xen0 (was: kernel-module packaging discussing broken into pieces: One specfile approach vs. splitted spec file), Axel Thimm
- Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Ville Skyttä
- Re: Re: kernel-module packaging discussing broken into pieces: One specfile approach vs. splitted spec file, Ville Skyttä
- Re: kernel-module packaging discussing broken into pieces: One specfile approach vs. splitted spec file, Axel Thimm
- Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Axel Thimm
- Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Axel Thimm
- Re: Re: kernel-module packaging discussing broken into pieces: One specfile approach vs. splitted spec file, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Ralf Corsepius
- The .pc and pkgconfig issue, Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Ralf Corsepius
August 16, 2006
- Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Jon Masters
- Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Axel Thimm
- Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Axel Thimm
- Re: kernel-module packaging discussing broken into pieces: One specfile approach vs. splitted spec file, Axel Thimm
- Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Toshio Kuratomi
- kernel-module packaging discussing broken into pieces: One specfile approach vs. splitted spec file, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Jesse Keating
- Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Axel Thimm
- Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Axel Thimm
- Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Axel Thimm
- Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Axel Thimm
- Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: Forbidden software in FE, Brian Pepple
- Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Ville Skyttä
- Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, seth vidal
- Re: Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!, José Matos
- Re: Re: fedorakmod.py unfixable, Jon Masters
- Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Axel Thimm
- Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Axel Thimm
- Re: Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!, Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Axel Thimm
- Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Warren Togami
- Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference, Warren Togami
August 15, 2006
- Re: Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!, Brian Pepple
- Re: Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!, Jesse Keating
- Re: Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!, Tim Jackson
- Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
- Re: fedorakmod.py unfixable, Axel Thimm
- Re: Re: fedorakmod.py unfixable, Jack Neely
- Re: fedorakmod.py unfixable, Axel Thimm
- Re: Re: fedorakmod.py unfixable, Rex Dieter
- Re: Re: fedorakmod.py unfixable, Jack Neely
- Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!, Jesse Keating
- Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!, Benny Amorsen
- Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!, David Woodhouse
- Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!, Jesse Keating
- Re: Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!, Rex Dieter
- Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!, Axel Thimm
- Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!, David Woodhouse
- Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!, Jesse Keating
- Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!, David Woodhouse
- Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!, David Woodhouse
- Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!, Jesse Keating
- Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!, Axel Thimm
- Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!, Axel Thimm
- Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!, Josh Boyer
- Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!, David Woodhouse
- Attention kernel module project packagers!, Axel Thimm
- Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!, Axel Thimm
- Re: get further rid of uname -r in the kmod stuff and solve the remaining kmod problem, Axel Thimm
- Re: kmod support - a diary of workarounds, Axel Thimm
- Re: fedorakmod.py unfixable, Axel Thimm
- Re: Re: Proposal: reject the one-spec approach, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Re: Proposal: reject the one-spec approach, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, Axel Thimm
- Re: Proposal: reject the one-spec approach, Axel Thimm
- Re: Proposal: reject the one-spec approach, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Proposal: reject the one-spec approach (was: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption), Axel Thimm
- Proposal: reject the one-spec approach (was: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption), Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Axel Thimm
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Jesse Keating
- Re: get further rid of uname -r in the kmod stuff and solve the remaining kmod problem, Axel Thimm
- Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Axel Thimm
- Re: Re: get further rid of uname -r in the kmod stuff and solve the remaining kmod problem, Toshio Kuratomi
- kmod support - a diary of workarounds (was: get further rid of uname -r in the kmod stuff and solve the remaining kmod problem), Axel Thimm
- Re: get further rid of uname -r in the kmod stuff and solve the remaining kmod problem, Jack Neely
- Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Axel Thimm
August 14, 2006
- Re: get further rid of uname -r in the kmod stuff and solve the remaining kmod problem, Jesse Keating
- Re: get further rid of uname -r in the kmod stuff and solve the remaining kmod problem, Axel Thimm
- Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Axel Thimm
- Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Axel Thimm
- Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Axel Thimm
- Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Axel Thimm
- Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Axel Thimm
- Pointer: Packaging discussion about Boost (C++) library, Kenneth Porter
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Panu Matilainen
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Jack Neely
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Panu Matilainen
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Jesse Keating
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Jack Neely
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, seth vidal
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Panu Matilainen
- Re: get further rid of uname -r in the kmod stuff and solve the remaining kmod problem, Jack Neely
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Jack Neely
- Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Jack Neely
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Jack Neely
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Jack Neely
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Jesse Keating
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Jack Neely
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Rex Dieter
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Panu Matilainen
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Jesse Keating
- Re: get further rid of uname -r in the kmod stuff and solve the remaining kmod problem, Panu Matilainen
- Re: get further rid of uname -r in the kmod stuff and solve the remaining kmod problem, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Panu Matilainen
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Jesse Keating
- Re: get further rid of uname -r in the kmod stuff and solve the remaining kmod problem, Jesse Keating
- Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Axel Thimm
- Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Axel Thimm
- get further rid of uname -r in the kmod stuff and solve the remaining kmod problem, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Jesse Keating
- Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Axel Thimm
- Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Rex Dieter
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Rex Dieter
- Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Axel Thimm
- Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Axel Thimm
- Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Axel Thimm
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Axel Thimm
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, seth vidal
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption, Tom 'spot' Callaway
August 09, 2006
- Re: Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, Rex Dieter
- Re: Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, Ville Skyttä
- Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, Axel Thimm
- Re: Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, Ville Skyttä
- Re: Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, Matthew Miller
- Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, Axel Thimm
- Re: Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, seth vidal
- Re: Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, Matthew Miller
- Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, Axel Thimm
- Re: Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, seth vidal
- Re: Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, Jack Neely
- Re: Do we need a Rule "Docs should be packaged as %doc"?, Rex Dieter
- Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, Axel Thimm
- Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, Axel Thimm
- Re: Do we need a Rule "Docs should be packaged as %doc"?, Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, Jack Neely
August 08, 2006
- Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, Axel Thimm
- Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, Axel Thimm
- Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, Axel Thimm
- Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, Jack Neely
- Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, Ville Skyttä
- Re: Do we need a Rule "Docs should be packaged as %doc"?, Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, seth vidal
- Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, seth vidal
- Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Do we need a Rule "Docs should be packaged as %doc"?, Jason L Tibbitts III
- Do we need a Rule "Docs should be packaged as %doc"?, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, Axel Thimm
- Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, Thorsten Leemhuis
- kmdl proposal and kmod flaws, Axel Thimm
- Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: blocking kmdl adoption at all costs?, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: atrpms kernel modules, Axel Thimm
- blocking kmdl adoption at all costs? (was: atrpms kernel modules), Axel Thimm
- Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules, Thorsten Leemhuis
August 07, 2006
- Re: atrpms kernel modules, Axel Thimm
- Re: atrpms kernel modules, Axel Thimm
- Re: Fix problems building Extras packages for FC3 and FC4, Clark Williams
- Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules, Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: atrpms kernel modules, Axel Thimm
- Re: Fix problems building Extras packages for FC3 and FC4, Clark Williams
- Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules, Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: atrpms kernel modules, Axel Thimm
- Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules, Jack Neely
|
|