Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>, spake thus:
> This may point to the need for our Makefile.common to provide a use case
> for a locally installed fedora-doc-common RPM. IOW, pointing to (if
> it's available, or possibly if nothing else is available, or... some
> combination thereof?) /usr/share/fedora/doc/docs-common/* for supporting
> stuff with which to build docs "standalone" without CVS. Does that make
> sense?
Not to me as a doc developer. See, I've got to have CVS for my
document anyway, so I just may as well keep the ../docs-common stuff
checked out. Why be "slightly pregnant"?
I keep envisioning only two use cases:
1) Developer -- eveything local from a CVS checkout, even if I don't
have CVS write permission.
2) End user, aka read-only -- install the RPM's and yelp away.
What am I missing?
Cheers
pgpLtSDDLhvNo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
|
