On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 12:41 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Rahul (sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said:
> > $subject is what would make Fedora Core qualify as a good sub project.
> > Currently there is a lot of active development obviously but there isnt
> > much visibility into the decision making processes and who is involved.
> >
> > My suggestion would be get the release engineering team and a few people
> > preferably some external to Red Hat to be part of the Fedora Core
> > steering committee and hold public weekly meetings in #fedora-devel in a
> > predetermined schedule and post meeting logs etc in a similar fashion to
> > Fedora Ambassadors or FESCo meetings.
>
> Well, it currently *has* a committee, we just don't have public meetings
> or logs.
Who is on the committee? And is there any reason they couldn't be
public?
josh
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
|
