Re: cman goes to userland

Lon Hohberger wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 19:25 +0100, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
> 
> 
>>It should be pretty easy. the "new" cman is really just a port of the
>>old one.
> 
> 
> ... except the old plugin predates libcman (by a long time), and uses
> the ioctl() methods of talking to the kernel ;)
>

Yes, but even the old libcman was just a wrapper round the ioctls, so
the concepts are the same.
-- 

patrick