|
What versions of the linux, cluster, dm and lvm2 tend to work well togther?: msg#00097linux.redhat.cluster
This is a multipart message in MIME format. Hi Everyone, I am running with the 2.6.10-1.770_FC3CRAW.root linux kernel, which I built it to support raw devices. I downloaded the CVS sources for RHEL4 branch of the cluster and the LVM2, and the device-mapper sources are from the HEAD of the CVS tree. I built and installed them on both of my linux systems. After rebooting: The ccsd command is executed successfully on both nodes. The "cman_tool join" command executed on both nodes eventually shows the msg: Cluster is quorate. Allowing connections. However, looking at the /proc/cluster/nodes files on both systems, I see the following: Node Votes Exp Sts Name 1 1 1 M ovn01 Node Votes Exp Sts Name 2 1 1 M ovn02 Why on ovn02 node, Node=2 and on ovn01 Node=1? Has each node created a cluster on its own? Some sort of brain split??? Then, I ran "fence_tool join" successfully on both systems. However, the "clvmd" cmd gave me the following messages on both systems: Apr 20 10:06:09 localhost clvmd: Unable to create lockspace for CLVM: Inappropriate ioctl for device Apr 20 10:06:10 localhost clvmd: Cannot login in to CCSD server With the above kernel, what versions of the cluster, dm and LVM2 are more likely to work well? Can anyone point me to ok versions of linux, dm, cluster and LVM2 rpms/srpms that work well together??? Any comments from you are greatly appreciated.... Thanks, Caroline ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See our award-winning line of tape and disk-based backup & recovery solutions at http://www.overlandstorage.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: cman goes to userland: 00097, Patrick Caulfield |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Linux-cluster Digest, Vol 12, Issue 17: 00097, CAugustine |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] libgulm not hadled correctly?i: 00097, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto |
| Next by Thread: | Re: What versions of the linux, cluster, dm and lvm2 tend to work well togther???: 00097, Patrick Caulfield |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |