Re: [PATCH] libgulm not hadled correctly?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Michael Conrad Tadpol Tilstra wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:23:40AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> 
>>while running an automated test to verify library integrity and consistency,
>>I noticed that libgulm.a was not an ar archive as it is supposed to be and
>>that libgulm.so.$(RELEASE_MAJOR) amd libgulm.so where not symlinks, but
>>plain copy of the library.
>>
>>I am not sure if this was just an overlook or if it was intended to be
>>that way.
>>
>>The following patch does what I think is the right thing.
>>
>>Please review before applying!
> 
> 
> Um, wild guess, but this is on CVS HEAD?
> assuming so, since that's the only branch where I forgot to fix the
> symlinks to the .so
> (Now that there are four branches, it would be nice if you could say
> which branch your patch is on.)

Yes sorry.. I forgot about that, but it was against CVS head.

I will take more care next time

Fabio
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCZ7dmhCzbekR3nhgRApP9AJ4/nZrHa0+KJS/iQylN0dUmRzLMDQCePSMj
CsdI5XqkyBdPHCUzPDh7RjU=
=knYZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----