|
Re: [PATCH] md - 1 of 12 - Missing mddev_put in md resync code: msg#00076linux.raid
On March 13, skormilo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Would this be when removing a recently-failed device? That can still > > oops. I should send in a patch for that... > > Yes in fact, that is the one I was seeing. > That one *should* be fixed in 2.4.-current-bk, but probably not completely. It is actually rather hard to get it just-right in 2.4. I substantially reworked the 2.5 code so that proper locking could be done so that this sort of problem could be avoided. 2.4 will porbably have to stay with "close-enough". > > I have an odd problem where the first rebuild performs as expected > (about 40MB/s), but any subsequent rebuild plods along at about 6-7MB/s. > There is no IO activity on the system other than the rebuild during my > tests. Does upping /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_min affect the speed? Does increasing the magic "32" in is_mddev_idle help? > > I tried putting in a couple of debug printk's here and there in the code > that backs off the resync, and the printk's themselves returned the > performance back to expected levels... some kind of a timing problem > perhaps? Don't you hate that! NeilBrown - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: raid1 bitmap code [Was: Re: Questions answered by Neil Brown]: 00076, Peter T. Breuer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | PATCH: raid1 on alpha: 00076, R. Scott Bailey |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] md - 1 of 12 - Missing mddev_put in md resync codei: 00076, Sean Kormilo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] md - 1 of 12 - Missing mddev_put in md resync code: 00076, Sean Kormilo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |