logo       

Re: [PATCH] md - 1 of 12 - Missing mddev_put in md resync code: msg#00055

linux.raid

Subject: Re: [PATCH] md - 1 of 12 - Missing mddev_put in md resync code

On March 12, skormilo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Neil,
>
> Are these patches safe to apply against 2.4 kernels?

No. There have been lots of changes since 2.4. Some patches might
conceptually apply, but they would need a bit of work to make them
actually apply.

>
> It looks like one or more of these might reduce the chances of the
> kernel oops I experience on occasion when manipulating arrays.

Would this be when removing a recently-failed device? That can still
oops. I should send in a patch for that...

>
> Also, this appears to change some of the way rebuilds are done, and am
> interested to see if this impacts some of the rebuild performance issues
> I've been seeing.

These patches are about management, not performance. They won't
affect rebuild performance at all. It is already quite good in 2.4 I
believe. But maybe my experience is different from your.

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise