linux.ports.x86-64.general (thread)

Re: [discuss] Weird cpu mapping on 8-way dual-core machine, Yinghai Lu
When is RBX used for base pointer?, H.J. Lu
- Re: [discuss] When is RBX used for base pointer?, Michael Matz
  - Re: [discuss] When is RBX used for base pointer?, H.J. Lu
    - Re: [discuss] When is RBX used for base pointer?, Michael Matz
    - Re: [discuss] When is RBX used for base pointer?, H.J. Lu
    - Re: [discuss] When is RBX used for base pointer?, Jan Hubicka
  - Re: [discuss] When is RBX used for base pointer?, Jan Hubicka
"ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Greg KH
- pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Greg KH
  - Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Alan Cox
    - Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Greg KH
    - Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
    - Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Greg KH
    - Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Greg KH
    - Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
    - Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Greg KH
    - Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
    - Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Greg KH
    - Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Sergei Shtylyov
    - Re: [discuss] pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Andreas Jaeger
    - Re: [discuss] pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
    - Re: [discuss] pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Greg KH
    - Re: [discuss] pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Greg KH
  - Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Muli Ben-Yehuda
    - Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Greg KH
    - Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Muli Ben-Yehuda
    - Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Greg KH
    - Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Greg KH
    - Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Muli Ben-Yehuda
    - Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Greg KH
    - Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Sam Ravnborg
    - Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, yong xue
    - Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Greg KH
    - Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Muli Ben-Yehuda
- Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Rene Herman
  - Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Greg KH
    - Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Rene Herman
    - Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Michael Ellerman
    - Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Rene Herman
    - Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Michael Ellerman
    - Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Rene Herman
    - Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Bill Davidsen
    - Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Matthew Wilcox
- Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Ken Moffat
  - Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Greg KH
    - Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Ken Moffat
    - Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Ken Moffat
- Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Dirk GOUDERS
  - Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Greg KH
    - Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Dirk GOUDERS
    - Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Dirk GOUDERS
    - Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Greg KH