linux.ports.x86-64.general (date)

February 27, 2008

Re: [discuss] Weird cpu mapping on 8-way dual-core machine, Yinghai Lu

February 20, 2008

Re: [discuss] pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Greg KH

February 19, 2008

Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Ken Moffat

February 17, 2008

Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Muli Ben-Yehuda

February 15, 2008

Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Greg KH
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, yong xue
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Sam Ravnborg
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Greg KH
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Matthew Wilcox
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Muli Ben-Yehuda
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Greg KH
Re: [discuss] pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Greg KH

February 14, 2008

Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Bill Davidsen
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Sergei Shtylyov
Re: [discuss] pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Re: [discuss] pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Andreas Jaeger
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Greg KH

February 13, 2008

Re: [discuss] When is RBX used for base pointer?, Jan Hubicka
Re: [discuss] When is RBX used for base pointer?, Jan Hubicka
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Greg KH
Re: [discuss] When is RBX used for base pointer?, H.J. Lu
Re: [discuss] When is RBX used for base pointer?, Michael Matz
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Michael Ellerman
Re: [discuss] When is RBX used for base pointer?, H.J. Lu
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Re: [discuss] When is RBX used for base pointer?, Michael Matz
When is RBX used for base pointer?, H.J. Lu
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Greg KH
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Dirk GOUDERS
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Greg KH
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Greg KH
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Muli Ben-Yehuda
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Greg KH
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Greg KH
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Ken Moffat
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Rene Herman
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Rene Herman
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Michael Ellerman
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Rene Herman
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Muli Ben-Yehuda
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Dirk GOUDERS
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Greg KH
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Dirk GOUDERS
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Greg KH
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Greg KH
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Greg KH
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Ken Moffat
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Alan Cox
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Rene Herman
"ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Greg KH
pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Greg KH