|
|
June 24, 2006
- Re: [PATCH] [29/82] x86_64: Rename IOMMU option, fix help and mark option embedded., Alan Cox
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC, patch] i386: vgetcpu(), take 2, Andi Kleen
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC, patch] i386: vgetcpu(), take 2, Rohit Seth
- Re: [PATCH] [20/82] i386: Panic the system when a NUMA kernel doesn't run on IBM NUMA, Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] [20/82] i386: Panic the system when a NUMA kernel doesn't run on IBM NUMA, Keith Mannthey
- Re: [PATCH] [20/82] i386: Panic the system when a NUMA kernel doesn't run on IBM NUMA, Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] [20/82] i386: Panic the system when a NUMA kernel doesn't run on IBM NUMA, Dave Jones
- Re: [PATCH] [55/82] i386/x86-64: Fix isoimage when syslinux is in /usr/share, H. Peter Anvin
- [PATCH] [65/82] i386/x86-64/ia64: Move polling flag into thread_info_status, Andi Kleen
- [PATCH] [69/82] i386/x86-64: adjust /proc/interrupts column headings, Andi Kleen
- [PATCH] [37/82] i386/x86-64: fall back to old-style call trace if no unwinding, Andi Kleen
- [PATCH] [39/82] i386/x86-64: Consolidate arch/{i386,x86_64}/boot/compressed/misc.c, Andi Kleen
- [PATCH] [55/82] i386/x86-64: Fix isoimage when syslinux is in /usr/share, Andi Kleen
- [PATCH] [36/82] i386: reliable stack trace support i386 entry.S, Andi Kleen
- [PATCH] [35/82] i386: reliable stack trace support (i386), Andi Kleen
- [PATCH] [16/82] i386/x86-64: simplify ioapic_register_intr(), Andi Kleen
- [PATCH] [20/82] i386: Panic the system when a NUMA kernel doesn't run on IBM NUMA, Andi Kleen
- [PATCH] [29/82] x86_64: Rename IOMMU option, fix help and mark option embedded., Andi Kleen
- [PATCH] [4/82] i386/x86-64: Use new official CPUID to get APICID/core split on AMD platforms, Andi Kleen
- [PATCH] [5/82] i386/x86-64: Emulate CPUID4 on AMD, Andi Kleen
June 22, 2006
- Re: [RFC, patch] i386: vgetcpu(), take 2, Rohit Seth
- Re: [RFC, patch] i386: vgetcpu(), take 2, Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH 0/25] Decouple IRQ issues (MSI, i386, x86_64, ia64), Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilitiesKJ, Greg Lindahl
June 21, 2006
- Re: [2.6 patch] x86_64: remove sys32_ni_syscall(), Andi Kleen
- [2.6 patch] x86_64: remove sys32_ni_syscall(), Adrian Bunk
- Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Do not use -ffunction-sections for modules, Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Do not use -ffunction-sections for modules, Sergey Vlasov
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilitiesKJ, Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH 0/25] Decouple IRQ issues (MSI, i386, x86_64, ia64), Greg KH
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilitiesKJ, Dave Olson
- [PATCH] Decouple IRQ issues (fix i386 compile issues), Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [PATCH 11/25] i386 irq: Dynamic irq support, Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [PATCH 0/25] Decouple IRQ issues (MSI, i386, x86_64, ia64), Ingo Molnar
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilitiesKJ, Andi Kleen
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilitiesKJ, Dave Olson
- RE: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilitiesKJ, Allen Martin
- Re: [PATCH 8/25] msi: Simplify the msi irq limit policy., Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [PATCH 8/25] msi: Simplify the msi irq limit policy., Roland Dreier
- Re: [PATCH 11/25] i386 irq: Dynamic irq support, Rajesh Shah
- Re: [PATCH 11/25] i386 irq: Dynamic irq support, Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [PATCH 11/25] i386 irq: Dynamic irq support, Rajesh Shah
- Re: [PATCH 6/25] msi: Implement helper functions read_msi_msg and write_msi_msg., Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [PATCH 9/25] irq: Add a dynamic irq creation API, Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH 8/25] msi: Simplify the msi irq limit policy., Rajesh Shah
- Re: [PATCH 9/25] irq: Add a dynamic irq creation API, Matthew Wilcox
- Re: [PATCH 9/25] irq: Add a dynamic irq creation API, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
- Re: [PATCH 7/25] msi: Refactor the msi_ops., Rajesh Shah
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Paul Jackson
- Re: [PATCH 4/25] msi: Simplify msi enable and disable., Eric W. Biederman
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Paul Jackson
- Re: [PATCH 6/25] msi: Implement helper functions read_msi_msg and write_msi_msg., Rajesh Shah
- Re: [PATCH 4/25] msi: Simplify msi enable and disable., Rajesh Shah
- Re: [PATCH 0/25] Decouple IRQ issues (MSI, i386, x86_64, ia64), Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [PATCH 9/25] irq: Add a dynamic irq creation API, Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [PATCH 0/25] Decouple IRQ issues (MSI, i386, x86_64, ia64), Rajesh Shah
June 20, 2006
- Re: [PATCH 9/25] irq: Add a dynamic irq creation API, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Brice Goglin
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Greg KH
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilitiesKJ, Roland Dreier
- Re: [PATCH 5/25] msi: Make the msi boolean tests return either 0 or 1., Jeff Garzik
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH 9/25] irq: Add a dynamic irq creation API, Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH 7/25] msi: Refactor the msi_ops., Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH 15/25] i386 irq: Move msi message composition into io_apic.c, Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH 23/25] x86_64 irq: Kill gsi_irq_sharing., Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH 22/25] x86_64 irq: make vector_irq per cpu., Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH 13/25] msi: Make the msi code irq based and not vector based., Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH 2/25] irq: Add moved_masked_irq, Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH 8/25] msi: Simplify the msi irq limit policy., Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH 5/25] msi: Make the msi boolean tests return either 0 or 1., Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH 3/25] x86_64 irq: Reenable migrating irqs to other cpus., Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH 24/25] x86_64 irq: Kill irq compression., Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilitiesKJ, Andi Kleen
- [PATCH 17/25] x86_64 irq: Remove the msi assumption that irq == vector, Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH 6/25] msi: Implement helper functions read_msi_msg and write_msi_msg., Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH 21/25] x86_64 irq: Make the external irq handlers report their vector, not the irq number., Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH 18/25] i386 irq: Remove the msi assumption that irq == vector, Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH 4/25] msi: Simplify msi enable and disable., Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH 14/25] x86_64 irq: Move msi message composition into io_apic.c, Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH 16/25] msi: Only build msi-apic.c on ia64, Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH 25/25] irq: Document what an IRQ is., Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH 12/25] x86_64 irq: Dynamic irq support, Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH 11/25] i386 irq: Dynamic irq support, Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH 19/25] irq: Remove msi hacks, Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH 20/25] irq: Generalize the check for HARDIRQ_BITS., Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH 1/25] irq: Convert the move_irq flag from a 32bit word to a single bit, Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH 10/25] ia64 irq: Dynamic irq support, Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH 0/25] Decouple IRQ issues (MSI, i386, x86_64, ia64), Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Brice Goglin
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Greg KH
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Dave Olson
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Jeff Garzik
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Jeff Garzik
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Brice Goglin
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Greg Lindahl
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Brice Goglin
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Roland Dreier
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Randy.Dunlap
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Greg Lindahl
- Re: [discuss] Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Jes Sorensen
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Jeff Garzik
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Andi Kleen
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Jeff Garzik
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Andi Kleen
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Dave Olson
June 16, 2006
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Brent Casavant
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Chase Venters
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Chase Venters
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Chase Venters
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Chase Venters
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Jakub Jelinek
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Jakub Jelinek
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Brent Casavant
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Zoltan Menyhart
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
- Re: [discuss] Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Zoltan Menyhart
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Jes Sorensen
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Zoltan Menyhart
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Jes Sorensen
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Jes Sorensen
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Jes Sorensen
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
June 14, 2006
- Re: [discuss] Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Ulrich Drepper
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Ulrich Drepper
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Steve Munroe
- Re: [discuss] Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Wolfram Gloger
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Alan Cox
- FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
- Re: [discuss] [PATCH 1/2] (resend) x86_64 stack overflow debugging, Andi Kleen
- Re: [discuss] [PATCH 1/2] (resend) x86_64 stack overflow debugging, Jan Beulich
|
|