linux.ports.x86-64.general (date)

linux.ports.x86-64.general (date)

May 30, 2006

[PATCH 5/6, fixed] reliable stack trace support (i386), Jan Beulich
[PATCH 2/6, fixed] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Jan Beulich
[PATCH 5/6, fixed] reliable stack trace support (i386), Jan Beulich
[PATCH 2/6, fixed] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Jan Beulich
[PATCH 1/6, fixed] reliable stack trace support, Jan Beulich

May 29, 2006

[PATCH 6/6, fixed] reliable stack trace support (i386 entry.S annotations), Jan Beulich

May 28, 2006

[PATCH] [3/7] i386: apic= command line option should always be, Andi Kleen

May 27, 2006

Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - move valid_dma_direction into the callers, Andi Kleen

May 26, 2006

Re: [PATCH 6/6] reliable stack trace support (i386 entry.S annotations), Andrew Morton
Re: [PATCH 6/6] reliable stack trace support (i386 entry.S annotations), Andrew Morton
Re: [PATCH 6/6] reliable stack trace support (i386 entry.S annotations), Andrew Morton
Re: [discuss] [RFC] [PATCH] Double syscall exit traces on x86_64, Jeff Dike
Re: PATCH: Change x86-64 maximum page size to 2MB, H. J. Lu
Re: [discuss] [RFC] [PATCH] Double syscall exit traces on x86_64, Andi Kleen
Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - move valid_dma_direction into the callers, Jeff Garzik
Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - move valid_dma_direction into the callers, Andi Kleen
Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - introduce iommu_detected, Andi Kleen
Re: [PATCH 6/6] reliable stack trace support (i386 entry.S annotations), Jan Beulich
Re: [PATCH 6/6] reliable stack trace support (i386 entry.S annotations), Andi Kleen
Re: [PATCH 6/6] reliable stack trace support (i386 entry.S annotations), Jan Beulich
Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - introduce iommu_detected, Jon Mason
[RFC] [PATCH] Double syscall exit traces on x86_64, Jeff Dike
Re: PATCH: Change x86-64 maximum page size to 2MB, H. J. Lu
Re: PATCH: Change x86-64 maximum page size to 2MB, Daniel Jacobowitz

May 25, 2006

PATCH: Change x86-64 maximum page size to 2MB, H. J. Lu
Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - introduce iommu_detected, Muli Ben-Yehuda
Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - move valid_dma_direction into the callers, Jeff Garzik
Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - move valid_dma_direction into the callers, Muli Ben-Yehuda
Re: [PATCH 6/6] reliable stack trace support (i386 entry.S annotations), Andrew Morton
Re: [PATCH 6/6] reliable stack trace support (i386 entry.S annotations), Andrew Morton
Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - move valid_dma_direction into the callers, Jeff Garzik
Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - introduce iommu_detected, Jon Mason
Re: [discuss] [PATCH 3/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - IOMMU abstractions, Jon Mason
Re: [discuss] [PATCH 3/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - IOMMU abstractions, Andi Kleen
Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - introduce iommu_detected, Andi Kleen
[PATCH 4/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - Calgary specific bits, Jon Mason
[PATCH 3/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - IOMMU abstractions, Jon Mason
[PATCH 2/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - move valid_dma_direction into the callers, Jon Mason
[PATCH 1/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - introduce iommu_detected, Jon Mason

May 22, 2006

Re: [PATCH 5/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (i386), Jan Beulich
Re: [PATCH 2/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Jan Beulich
Re: [PATCH 5/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (i386), Andi Kleen
Re: [PATCH 3/6] reliable stack trace support (x86-64 IRQ stack adjustment), Andi Kleen
Re: [PATCH 2/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Andi Kleen
[PATCH 6/6] reliable stack trace support (i386 entry.S annotations), Jan Beulich
[PATCH 5/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (i386), Jan Beulich
[PATCH 4/6] reliable stack trace support (x86-64 syscall adjustment), Jan Beulich
[PATCH 3/6] reliable stack trace support (x86-64 IRQ stack adjustment), Jan Beulich
[PATCH 2/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Jan Beulich
[PATCH 1/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support, Jan Beulich

May 19, 2006

Re: RFC: Change x86-64 maximum page size to 2MB, Nick Clifton

May 18, 2006

Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support, Andi Kleen
Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support, Jan Beulich
Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 2/3] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Andi Kleen
Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support, Pavel Machek
Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support, Jan Beulich
Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 2/3] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Jan Beulich
Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 2/3] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Andi Kleen
Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support, Pavel Machek
Re: [PATCH] Fix do_mlock so page alignment is to hugepage boundries when needed, Hugh Dickins
Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 2/3] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Jan Beulich

May 17, 2006

Re: [PATCH] Fix do_mlock so page alignment is to hugepage boundries when needed, Eric Paris
Re: [PATCH] Fix do_mlock so page alignment is to hugepage boundries when needed, Eric Paris
Re: [PATCH] Fix do_mlock so page alignment is to hugepage boundries when needed, Hugh Dickins
Re: [PATCH] Fix do_mlock so page alignment is to hugepage boundries when needed, Christoph Lameter
[PATCH] Fix do_mlock so page alignment is to hugepage boundries when needed, Eric Paris

May 16, 2006

RFC: Change x86-64 maximum page size to 2MB, H. J. Lu
Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 2/3] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Andi Kleen
Funnies with remap_pfn_range, x86_64, > 4GB RAM, kernels < 2.6.16, Bryan O'Sullivan
Re: [PATCH 3/3] reliable stack trace support (i386), Jan Beulich
Re: [PATCH 2/3] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Jan Beulich
Re: [PATCH 2/3] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Jan Beulich
Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support, Jan Beulich
Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support, Ingo Molnar
Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 3/3] reliable stack trace support (i386), Andi Kleen
Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support, Jan Beulich
Re: [PATCH 3/3] reliable stack trace support (i386), Andi Kleen
Re: [PATCH 2/3] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Andi Kleen
Re: [PATCH 3/3] reliable stack trace support (i386), Ingo Molnar
Re: [PATCH 2/3] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Ingo Molnar
Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support, Ingo Molnar
Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support, Andi Kleen
Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support, Ingo Molnar
[PATCH 3/3] reliable stack trace support (i386), Jan Beulich
[PATCH 2/3] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Jan Beulich
[PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support, Jan Beulich

May 12, 2006

Re: Linux v2.6.17-rc4, Andi Kleen

May 05, 2006

Re: [PATCH] [7/7] x86_64: Move ondemand timer into own work queue, Dave Jones
[PATCH] [7/7] x86_64: Move ondemand timer into own work queue, Andi Kleen

May 03, 2006

[PATCH] kexec uses incorrect nmi handler on x86/x86_64 V2, Don Zickus

May 02, 2006

Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] make PC Speaker driver work on x86-64, Andi Kleen
Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] make PC Speaker driver work on x86-64, Andi Kleen
Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] make PC Speaker driver work on x86-64, matthieu castet
Re: [PATCH] kexec uses incorrect nmi handler on x86/x86_64 V2, Vivek Goyal
Re: [discuss] [PATCH] kexec uses incorrect nmi handler on x86/x86_64 V2, Andi Kleen
[PATCH] kexec uses incorrect nmi handler on x86/x86_64 V2, Don Zickus
Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] make PC Speaker driver work on x86-64, Andi Kleen
Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] make PC Speaker driver work on x86-64, matthieu castet
Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] kexec uses incorrect nmi handler on x86/x86_64, Andi Kleen
Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] kexec uses incorrect nmi handler on x86/x86_64, Vivek Goyal
Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] kexec uses incorrect nmi handler on x86/x86_64, Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao
Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] kexec uses incorrect nmi handler on x86/x86_64, Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao
Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] kexec uses incorrect nmi handler on x86/x86_64, Andi Kleen
Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] kexec uses incorrect nmi handler on x86/x86_64, Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao
Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] kexec uses incorrect nmi handler on x86/x86_64, Andi Kleen
Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] kexec uses incorrect nmi handler on x86/x86_64, Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao
Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] kexec uses incorrect nmi handler on x86/x86_64, Andi Kleen

May 01, 2006

Re: [PATCH] kexec uses incorrect nmi handler on x86/x86_64, Vivek Goyal
Re: [discuss] [RFC] make PC Speaker driver work on x86-64, Jan Engelhardt

News | FAQ | advertise