|
|
May 30, 2006
- [PATCH 5/6, fixed] reliable stack trace support (i386), Jan Beulich
- [PATCH 2/6, fixed] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Jan Beulich
- [PATCH 5/6, fixed] reliable stack trace support (i386), Jan Beulich
- [PATCH 2/6, fixed] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Jan Beulich
- [PATCH 1/6, fixed] reliable stack trace support, Jan Beulich
May 26, 2006
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] reliable stack trace support (i386 entry.S annotations), Andrew Morton
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] reliable stack trace support (i386 entry.S annotations), Andrew Morton
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] reliable stack trace support (i386 entry.S annotations), Andrew Morton
- Re: [discuss] [RFC] [PATCH] Double syscall exit traces on x86_64, Jeff Dike
- Re: PATCH: Change x86-64 maximum page size to 2MB, H. J. Lu
- Re: [discuss] [RFC] [PATCH] Double syscall exit traces on x86_64, Andi Kleen
- Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - move valid_dma_direction into the callers, Jeff Garzik
- Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - move valid_dma_direction into the callers, Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - introduce iommu_detected, Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] reliable stack trace support (i386 entry.S annotations), Jan Beulich
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] reliable stack trace support (i386 entry.S annotations), Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] reliable stack trace support (i386 entry.S annotations), Jan Beulich
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - introduce iommu_detected, Jon Mason
- [RFC] [PATCH] Double syscall exit traces on x86_64, Jeff Dike
- Re: PATCH: Change x86-64 maximum page size to 2MB, H. J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: Change x86-64 maximum page size to 2MB, Daniel Jacobowitz
May 25, 2006
- PATCH: Change x86-64 maximum page size to 2MB, H. J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - introduce iommu_detected, Muli Ben-Yehuda
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - move valid_dma_direction into the callers, Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - move valid_dma_direction into the callers, Muli Ben-Yehuda
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] reliable stack trace support (i386 entry.S annotations), Andrew Morton
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] reliable stack trace support (i386 entry.S annotations), Andrew Morton
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - move valid_dma_direction into the callers, Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - introduce iommu_detected, Jon Mason
- Re: [discuss] [PATCH 3/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - IOMMU abstractions, Jon Mason
- Re: [discuss] [PATCH 3/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - IOMMU abstractions, Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - introduce iommu_detected, Andi Kleen
- [PATCH 4/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - Calgary specific bits, Jon Mason
- [PATCH 3/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - IOMMU abstractions, Jon Mason
- [PATCH 2/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - move valid_dma_direction into the callers, Jon Mason
- [PATCH 1/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - introduce iommu_detected, Jon Mason
May 22, 2006
- Re: [PATCH 5/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (i386), Jan Beulich
- Re: [PATCH 2/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Jan Beulich
- Re: [PATCH 5/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (i386), Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] reliable stack trace support (x86-64 IRQ stack adjustment), Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH 2/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Andi Kleen
- [PATCH 6/6] reliable stack trace support (i386 entry.S annotations), Jan Beulich
- [PATCH 5/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (i386), Jan Beulich
- [PATCH 4/6] reliable stack trace support (x86-64 syscall adjustment), Jan Beulich
- [PATCH 3/6] reliable stack trace support (x86-64 IRQ stack adjustment), Jan Beulich
- [PATCH 2/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Jan Beulich
- [PATCH 1/6, 2nd try] reliable stack trace support, Jan Beulich
May 18, 2006
- Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support, Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support, Jan Beulich
- Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 2/3] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support, Pavel Machek
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support, Jan Beulich
- Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 2/3] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Jan Beulich
- Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 2/3] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support, Pavel Machek
- Re: [PATCH] Fix do_mlock so page alignment is to hugepage boundries when needed, Hugh Dickins
- Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 2/3] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Jan Beulich
May 16, 2006
- RFC: Change x86-64 maximum page size to 2MB, H. J. Lu
- Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 2/3] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Andi Kleen
- Funnies with remap_pfn_range, x86_64, > 4GB RAM, kernels < 2.6.16, Bryan O'Sullivan
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] reliable stack trace support (i386), Jan Beulich
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Jan Beulich
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Jan Beulich
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support, Jan Beulich
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 3/3] reliable stack trace support (i386), Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support, Jan Beulich
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] reliable stack trace support (i386), Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] reliable stack trace support (i386), Ingo Molnar
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Ingo Molnar
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support, Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support, Ingo Molnar
- [PATCH 3/3] reliable stack trace support (i386), Jan Beulich
- [PATCH 2/3] reliable stack trace support (x86-64), Jan Beulich
- [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support, Jan Beulich
May 02, 2006
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] make PC Speaker driver work on x86-64, Andi Kleen
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] make PC Speaker driver work on x86-64, Andi Kleen
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] make PC Speaker driver work on x86-64, matthieu castet
- Re: [PATCH] kexec uses incorrect nmi handler on x86/x86_64 V2, Vivek Goyal
- Re: [discuss] [PATCH] kexec uses incorrect nmi handler on x86/x86_64 V2, Andi Kleen
- [PATCH] kexec uses incorrect nmi handler on x86/x86_64 V2, Don Zickus
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] make PC Speaker driver work on x86-64, Andi Kleen
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] make PC Speaker driver work on x86-64, matthieu castet
- Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] kexec uses incorrect nmi handler on x86/x86_64, Andi Kleen
- Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] kexec uses incorrect nmi handler on x86/x86_64, Vivek Goyal
- Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] kexec uses incorrect nmi handler on x86/x86_64, Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao
- Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] kexec uses incorrect nmi handler on x86/x86_64, Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao
- Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] kexec uses incorrect nmi handler on x86/x86_64, Andi Kleen
- Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] kexec uses incorrect nmi handler on x86/x86_64, Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao
- Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] kexec uses incorrect nmi handler on x86/x86_64, Andi Kleen
- Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] kexec uses incorrect nmi handler on x86/x86_64, Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao
- Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] kexec uses incorrect nmi handler on x86/x86_64, Andi Kleen
|
|