|
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken: msg#00115linux.ports.x86-64.general
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 04:37:03PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 16:04 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > > Nope, it breaks with a current git-2.6.14. Here's what my extra > printk says: > > Node 0: 0xe000074104e67200 > Node 1: 0xe000082080722000 > Node 2: 0xe000000101532000 > Placing software IO TLB between 0x74108e68000 - 0x7410ce68000 > Hope the following works. Using __alloc_bootmem_node now with a hard coded goal to avoid 16MB DMA zone. It is ugly :( and hope it works this time <fingers crossed>. -- Patch to ensure low32 mem allocation for x86_64 swiotlb Signed-off-by: Ravikiran Thirumalai <kiran@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Index: linux-2.6.14-rc4/arch/ia64/lib/swiotlb.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.14-rc4.orig/arch/ia64/lib/swiotlb.c 2005-10-18 14:14:12.000000000 -0700 +++ linux-2.6.14-rc4/arch/ia64/lib/swiotlb.c 2005-10-18 16:09:51.000000000 -0700 @@ -106,6 +106,8 @@ __setup("swiotlb=", setup_io_tlb_npages); /* make io_tlb_overflow tunable too? */ +#define IS_LOWPAGES(paddr, size) ((paddr < 0xffffffff) && ((paddr+size) < 0xffffffff)) + /* * Statically reserve bounce buffer space and initialize bounce buffer data * structures for the software IO TLB used to implement the PCI DMA API. @@ -114,17 +116,46 @@ swiotlb_init_with_default_size (size_t default_size) { unsigned long i; + unsigned long iotlbsz; + int node; if (!io_tlb_nslabs) { io_tlb_nslabs = (default_size >> IO_TLB_SHIFT); io_tlb_nslabs = ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE); } + iotlbsz = io_tlb_nslabs * (1 << IO_TLB_SHIFT); + /* - * Get IO TLB memory from the low pages + * Get IO TLB memory from the 0-4G range */ - io_tlb_start = alloc_bootmem_low_pages(io_tlb_nslabs * - (1 << IO_TLB_SHIFT)); + + for_each_online_node(node) { + /* Ugly, hate it. To be gone post 2.6.14 */ + io_tlb_start = __alloc_bootmem_node(NODE_DATA(node), + iotlbsz, PAGE_SIZE, + 0x1000000); + if (io_tlb_start) { + if (IS_LOWPAGES(virt_to_phys(io_tlb_start), iotlbsz)) + break; + free_bootmem_node(NODE_DATA(node), + virt_to_phys(io_tlb_start), iotlbsz); + io_tlb_start = NULL; + } + } + + /* + * FIXME: This should go away when the bootmem allocator is fixed to + * guarantee lowmem32 allocations somehow, and the swiotlb mess is + * cleaned. The alloc_bootmem_low_pages fall back is to ensure + * boxes like amd64 which donot use swiotlb but still have + * swiotlb compiled in, falls back to the 2.6.13 behaviour instead + * of panicking, when proper low32 pages are not available + */ + if (!io_tlb_start) + io_tlb_start = alloc_bootmem_low_pages(io_tlb_nslabs * + (1 << IO_TLB_SHIFT)); + if (!io_tlb_start) panic("Cannot allocate SWIOTLB buffer"); io_tlb_end = io_tlb_start + io_tlb_nslabs * (1 << IO_TLB_SHIFT); |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken: 00115, Ravikiran G Thirumalai |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken: 00115, Alex Williamson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb brokeni: 00115, Alex Williamson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken: 00115, Alex Williamson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |