|
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken: msg#00108linux.ports.x86-64.general
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 10:23:51AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Tuesday 18 October 2005 02:16, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 02:11:20PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > There seem to be a lot of proposed solutions floating about and I fear > > > > that different people will try to fix this in different ways. Do we > > > > all agree that this patch is the correct solution to this problem, or > > > > is something more needed? > > > > > > I think this will fix it. > > > > I just tried Yasunori-sans patch on our x460. It doesn't fix the problem. > > That's surprising. Can you post the full boot log? I'd already posted that... Here is the link http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=112959469914681&w=2 > The nodes should be really in order. Maybe we need to sort the SRAT first. I don't understand this comment. I thought Yasunori-san's patch did not require pgdats to be in any order.. Anywayz, the x460 nodes _are_ in proper order. Thanks, Kiran |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken: 00108, Ravikiran G Thirumalai |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken: 00108, Ravikiran G Thirumalai |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb brokeni: 00108, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken: 00108, Linus Torvalds |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |