Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken

On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 21:09 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Monday 17 October 2005 21:04, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> > So the only thing that worried me (and made me ask whether there might be
> > machines where it doesn't work) is if some machines might have their high
> > memory (or no memory at all) on NODE(0). It does sound unlikely, but I
> > simple don't know what kind of strange NUMA configs there are out there.
> 
> It could happen in VirtualIron (they seem to interleave node 0 over many 
> nodes 
> to get equal use of lowmem in 32bit NUMA), but should not in x86-64..
>  
does VirtualIron work with kernel.org kernels at all?