|
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken: msg#00084linux.ports.x86-64.general
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 08:08:24PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Monday 17 October 2005 19:52, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote: > > > No they are not. IBM X460s are generally available machines and the bug > > affects those boxes. > > No reports from that front so far. Attached is the dmesg on x460 which shows where swiotlb is allocated. > > > How can there be a major kernel release which is known > > to have breakage?? > > Welcome to the painful real world of software engineering. > > Every software has bugs and if you want to ever get a release out you > have to make such decisions sometimes. > > As an alternative I can just backout the patch that enables the Intel > SRAT code. That is probably better for a short term fix and will > not regress anybody. Intel SRAT code? which patch are you referring to? How is that relevant here? Thanks, Kiran
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken: 00084, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken: 00084, Muli Ben-Yehuda |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb brokeni: 00084, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken: 00084, Christoph Lameter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |