|
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken: msg#00081linux.ports.x86-64.general
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote: > Maybe someone with access to ia64 NUMA boxen can check if the NODE(0) > solution works (and does not break anything) on ia64? Chrisoph, can you help? Umm... SGI does not use the swiotlb and we do not have these issues. HP does use the swiotlb on IA64. CCing John and Alex. For the newcomers: Thread is at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=112954203900001&r=1&w=2 Proposed patch by Kiran: Index: linux-2.6.14-rc4/arch/ia64/lib/swiotlb.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.14-rc4.orig/arch/ia64/lib/swiotlb.c 2005-10-14 00:06:21.000000000 -0700 +++ linux-2.6.14-rc4/arch/ia64/lib/swiotlb.c 2005-10-17 00:05:22.000000000 -0700 @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ /* * Get IO TLB memory from the low pages */ - io_tlb_start = alloc_bootmem_low_pages(io_tlb_nslabs * + io_tlb_start = alloc_bootmem_node(NODE_DATA(0), io_tlb_nslabs * (1 << IO_TLB_SHIFT)); if (!io_tlb_start) panic("Cannot allocate SWIOTLB buffer"); |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken: 00081, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken: 00081, Muli Ben-Yehuda |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb brokeni: 00081, Ravikiran G Thirumalai |
| Next by Thread: | Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken: 00081, Alex Williamson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |