|
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken: msg#00075linux.ports.x86-64.general
On Monday 17 October 2005 17:56, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 05:40:56PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > First this problem is definitely not critical. AFAIK it only happens on > > scalex's unreleased machines. Intel NUMA x86 machines are really rare > > and on AMD it doesn't happen because the swiotlb is not used there. > > It's not used by default, but there are cases where it's used and it > would be a shame to release a major kernel and knowingly break > them. For example, any setup that used iommu_force or any non-AMD > x86-64 machine with more than 4GB of memory and only 32-bit capable > DMA devices. ... but risk breaking other stuff. Unless you can get the ARM and/or IA64 people to do some retesting with the proposed fixes it's quite risky. Sometimes you have to make compromises before releases. > Another alternative is to temporarily > provide a different version of swiotlb_init() for x86-64 and IA64 - > I can whip up a patch if that's acceptable. I don't want that. -Andi |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken: 00075, Muli Ben-Yehuda |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken: 00075, Linus Torvalds |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb brokeni: 00075, Muli Ben-Yehuda |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken: 00075, Russell King |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |