|
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken: msg#00068linux.ports.x86-64.general
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Andi Kleen wrote: > > The patch is actually not quite correct - in theory node 0 could be too small > to contain the full swiotlb bounce buffers. Is node 0 guaranteed to be all low-memory? What if it allocates stuff at the end of memory on NODE(0)? Anyway, it sounds like "alloc_bootmem_low_pages()" is seriously buggered if it allocates non-low pages, if only because of its name... > The real fix would be to get rid of the pgdata lists and just walk the > node_online_map on bootmem.c. The memory hotplug guys have > a patch pending for this. Argh. Which one should I pick? The NODE(0) one looks simpler, but is it sufficient for now in practice (with the real one going into 2.6.14+)? Linus |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken: 00068, Yasunori Goto |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken: 00068, Ravikiran G Thirumalai |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb brokeni: 00068, Yasunori Goto |
| Next by Thread: | Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken: 00068, Ravikiran G Thirumalai |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |