|
|
Mozy Online Backup: 2GB Free. Automatic. Secure.
Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 / GLIBC 2.2.[35] problems, [followup] - msg#00114
List: linux.ports.arm.general
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 01:27:50AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 02:34:25AM +0300, Nick Patavalis wrote:
> > # /usr/local/arm/bin/arm-linux-gcc tst.c -o tst
> >
> > /usr/local/arm/bin/../lib/gcc-lib/arm-linux/3.2/../../../../arm-linux/bin/as:
> > /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.2.3' not found (required by
> > /usr/local/arm/bin/../lib/gcc-lib/arm-linux/3.2/../../../../arm-linux/bin/as)
>
> your hosts glibc is too old.
Indeed. I have libc-2.13 on my host. Though I still believe that the
toolchain doesn't work (see the ld-2.2.5.so crash mentioned). Has it
worked for you?
/npat
--
I'm writing a book. I've got the page numbers done.
-- Stephen Wright
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscription options: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm
FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/armlinux/mailinglists.php
Was this page helpful?
Thread at a glance:
Previous Message by Date:
click to view message preview
Re: make dep problem with linux-2.4.19-rmk2
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 05:06:13PM -0700, Luis Javier Perez Alvarez wrote:
> I am having problems when I try to "make dep" with
> linux-2.4.19-rmk2.
>[cut]
> I seem to me like if I needed a runnig cross compiler
> for ARM, but that is what I want to have headers to
> continue with the tool chain generation....
You don't need to "make dep" for the headers to be available.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscription options: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm
FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/armlinux/mailinglists.php
Next Message by Date:
click to view message preview
Cirrus Logic EP7312 Support
Hi All,
I've searched everywhere I can think of but have not been able to find a
definitive list of what Linux supports on the Cirrus Logic EP7312
development board (which is made by Cogent I understand).
Can someone tell me what features are supported (and how well) so that I can
get a gauge of how much work is needed to get it doing what I need it to do.
Currently I haven't bought the kit yet but probably will as the EP7312
appears to have everything I need.
In particular the features I'm most interested in are
- LCD
- IDE
- Audio
- Compact Flash (I know the dev board doesn't have CF but I will be adding
it later)
- Touch screen
- Ethernet
- Keyboard
Can anyone help me and/or give me any advice regarding this chip before I
purchase the dev kit.
Thanks in advance,
Jason Austin
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscription options: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm
FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/armlinux/mailinglists.php
Previous Message by Thread:
click to view message preview
Re: GCC 3.1 / GLIBC 2.2.[35] problems, [followup]
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 02:34:25AM +0300, Nick Patavalis wrote:
> which also doesn't work for two reasons. Firstly:
>
> # cd /
> # tar -xIvf cross-3.2.tar.bz2
> # /usr/local/arm/bin/arm-linux-gcc tst.c -o tst
>
> /usr/local/arm/bin/../lib/gcc-lib/arm-linux/3.2/../../../../arm-linux/bin/as:
> /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.2.3' not found (required by
> /usr/local/arm/bin/../lib/gcc-lib/arm-linux/3.2/../../../../arm-linux/bin/as)
your hosts glibc is too old. Either you don't have glibc 2.2, or
you do have glibc 2.2, but an old buggy one. If the latter, I'd
really suggest getting the latest updates from your vendor.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscription options: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm
FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/armlinux/mailinglists.php
Next Message by Thread:
click to view message preview
Re: GCC 3.1 / GLIBC 2.2.[35] problems, [followup]
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 09:05:46AM +0100, Matt Dainty wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 10:21:03AM +0300, Nick Patavalis wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 12:55:31AM +0100, Matt Dainty wrote:
> > > You seem to be having the exact same problem as me.
> > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org has a GCC patch to apply
> > > on top of 3.2
> >
> > Do you remember where you found the patch?
>
> It's here:
>
> http://www.mirror.ac.uk/sites/ftp.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs-packages/4.0/gcc-3.2.patch.bz2
>
Thanks!
Looking arround I found these two:
Descriptions:
http://www.zipworld.com.au/~gschafer/lfs-tweaks.html
Actual patches
http://www.zipworld.com.au/%7Egschafer/patches/gcc-3.2.fix-copy.patch.gz
http://www.zipworld.com.au/%7Egschafer/patches/gcc-3.2.fix-var.patch.gz
Which are the same as "your"s
Another issue I'd like to ask you is, since you mentioned that
binutils-3.13 are broken, have you managed to produce *any* working
binary with them, or the fail all the time? Do the fail all the time
or only on specific cases?
/npat
--
flowchart, v.: To obfuscate (a problem) with esoteric cartoons.
-- Stan Kelly-Bootle
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscription options: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm
FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/armlinux/mailinglists.php
|
|