|
Re: glibc2.2.4 link error: msg#00107linux.ports.arm.general
Dear Mr. mpsuzuki > (1) revision of binutils2.9 - real vanilla binutils-2.9? > > (2) gcc2.96-xscale is essential for your purpose? > other gcc-2.95.x (buggy optimization for ARM) > or gcc-3.0.x are not good? All of binutils and gcc2.96's source code where is I download from http://developer.intel.com/design/intelxscale/dev_tools/010827/. The binutils version is 2.9.X. I'll try other version of gcc later. > (3) glibc-2.2.4 (vanilla? or with some RedHat patches?) > is essential for your purpose? how about 2.2.5? I also try to cross-compile 2.2.5, but still has multiple definition error. I use the same cross-compiler to build the kernel-2.4.18, and download zImage to pxa250, it's success running. Now I need the glibc to support my application. Please give me some suggest. -- Best regards, Tao Zhang ------------------------------ <www.davworld.net> <tzhang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Tel: (+8610)68717158-2603 ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/armlinux/mailinglists.php Please visit the above addresses for information on this list. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: glibc2.2.4 link error: 00107, mpsuzuki |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RT-Linux on ARM: 00107, Sunil Beta |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: glibc2.2.4 link errori: 00107, mpsuzuki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: glibc2.2.4 link error: 00107, mpsuzuki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |