Hey all,
I have users that need root access to their workstations. Reading the pam
documentation for the pam_wheel module it sounds like I can allow them to
'su -' without entering a password. This is ideal because I don't want to
give them that root password, i'd rather keep that to myself. Problem is,
it doesn't work. I'm using red hat 7.2. Here is the contents of
/etc/pam.d/su:
#%PAM-1.0
auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_rootok.so
# Uncomment the following line to implicitly trust users in the "wheel" group.
auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_wheel.so trust use_uid
# Uncomment the following line to require a user to be in the "wheel" group.
#auth required /lib/security/pam_wheel.so use_uid
auth required /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth
account required /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth
password required /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth
session required /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth
session optional /lib/security/pam_xauth.so
Here is output from the id command as a user:
uid=976(jabagley) gid=100(users) groups=100(users),0(root),98(ident)
when 'su -' is entered, i am prompted for a password. Did I
missunderstand the pam documentation? what is wrong?
thanks,
--
James Bagley | CDI Innovantage
james_bagley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Technical Computing UNIX Admin Support
DON'T PANIC | Agilent Technologies IT
Phone: (541) 738-3340 | Corvallis, Oregon
--
Thread at a glance:
Previous Message by Date:
click to view message preview
Re: Pam-list digest, Vol 1 #487 - 4 msgs
> It's all documented in Apache Doc. You need to use the following line in
> you're .htaccess file so that passwords distinct from the system
> database work:
>
> AuthPAM_Enabled Off
>
>
> Otherwise regular system accounts are used.
Does Apache2 switch back to uid 0 to read /etc/shadow ?? Just wondering.
Igmar
Next Message by Date:
click to view message preview
Re: pam_wheel
James Bagley Jr wrote:
Hey all,
I have users that need root access to their workstations. Reading the pam
documentation for the pam_wheel module it sounds like I can allow them to
'su -' without entering a password. This is ideal because I don't want to
give them that root password, i'd rather keep that to myself.
Why not use sudo. We use that so that we can login as root with our own
password, and not know the root password. You can also sudo with no
password, but it is a bigger security hole.
Forrest
Previous Message by Thread:
click to view message preview
Re: Pam-list digest, Vol 1 #487 - 4 msgs
Hello,
I think you need to look at the htpasswd program's man page. The
passwords are not stored in /etc/password.
I have a Apache2 configuration which does htaccess based authentication
It's all documented in Apache Doc. You need to use the following line in
you're .htaccess file so that passwords distinct from the system
database work:
AuthPAM_Enabled Off
Otherwise regular system accounts are used.
Sincerely,
Klaus
--
Klaus Steinberger Beschleunigerlabor der TU und LMU Muenchen
Phone: (+49 89)289 14287 Hochschulgelaende, D-85748 Garching, Germany
FAX: (+49 89)289 14280 EMail:
Klaus.Steinberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
URL: http://www.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~k2/
In a world without fences and walls, who needs Windows and Gates?
Next Message by Thread:
click to view message preview
Re: pam_wheel
James Bagley Jr wrote:
Hey all,
I have users that need root access to their workstations. Reading the pam
documentation for the pam_wheel module it sounds like I can allow them to
'su -' without entering a password. This is ideal because I don't want to
give them that root password, i'd rather keep that to myself.
Why not use sudo. We use that so that we can login as root with our own
password, and not know the root password. You can also sudo with no
password, but it is a bigger security hole.
Forrest