|
Re: Changes going into 1.x: msg#00016linux.lfs.clfs.devel
Jonathan Davis wrote: > > > As long as it works, I don't think that I really care which approach > we use, but I thought that CLFS 2.0 (now CLFS sysroot) was supposed to > be using the sysroot approach. If CLFS 1.x starts using it, what will > be the difference between the two? Or will CLFS sysroot disappear > once CLFS 1.x has switched to that approach? clfs-2.0 (renamed clfs-sysroot) uses sysroot to compile the final system, skipping /tools entirely. In clfs-1.0 sysroot is being used to compile /tools. You still have to chroot/boot into /tools to build the final system. Buildin the toolchain this way there's no need to symlink $CLFS/tools and $CLFS/cross-tools to /. There are no directories/references outside of $CLFS now. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Changes going into 1.x: 00016, Jonathan Davis |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Changes going into 1.x: 00016, Jim Gifford |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Changes going into 1.xi: 00016, Jonathan Davis |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Changes going into 1.x: 00016, Jim Gifford |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |