|
Re: Changes going into 1.x: msg#00015linux.lfs.clfs.devel
Just wanted to give everyone warning here. Joe and I will be making As long as it works, I don't think that I really care which approach we use, but I thought that CLFS 2.0 (now CLFS sysroot) was supposed to be using the sysroot approach. If CLFS 1.x starts using it, what will be the difference between the two? Or will CLFS sysroot disappear once CLFS 1.x has switched to that approach? - Jonathan Davis |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: clfs-embedded: 00015, Ken Moffat |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Changes going into 1.x: 00015, Joe Ciccone |
| Previous by Thread: | Changes going into 1.xi: 00015, Jim Gifford |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Changes going into 1.x: 00015, Joe Ciccone |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |