|
Re: [dm-devel] RE: [RFC PATCH 4/4] convert scsi to blkerr error values: msg#00074linux.kernel.device-mapper.devel
goggin, edward wrote: Mike, I have been working on this but a issue I was wondering about is what to do when someone other than dm-multipath wants to know about this special error value. For example when we first discover devices if it is passive path, we have to go through the pain of the regular setup and any retires that arise from it. If people are not going to complain about this anymore then you can ignore this mail :) But the problem (or issue people gripe about) is that if there is a magic ASC/ASCQ value for vendor XYZ that indicates we are sending requests to a passive path then who decodes the bi_extended_error value when dm-mutliapth is not used? Will we have to have a vendor specific bi_extended_error decoder for dm-mpath, filesystems and buffer head code, and what about SCSI? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: PATCH - pvmove doesn't terminate sometimes on 64-bit bigendian machines: 00074, Alasdair G Kergon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [dm-devel] RE: [RFC PATCH 4/4] convert scsi to blkerr error v alues: 00074, goggin, edward |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] convert scsi to blkerr error valuesi: 00074, Mike Christie |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [RFC PATCH 4/4] convert scsi to blkerr error values: 00074, goggin, edward |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |