|
Re: gdb_regs fix.: msg#00172linux.kernel.debugging.kgdb.bugs
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 01:44:07PM +0530, Milind Dumbare wrote: > I have slightly changed the way gdb_regs is defined as we have noticed > that the way it was done is not necessary. Attached patch changes > definition of gdb_regs in kernel/kgdb.c accordingly. You just broken ppc64 with this change (if you're bringing it back to the previous definition). Thinking back, there are both 32 and 64bit registers we need to save and in some corner cases we would otherwise not save all state. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Separate 'continue' and 'step' handling from other remote packet handling: 00172, Tom Rini |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: kgdb 2.3 hangs: 00172, Ming Zhang |
| Previous by Thread: | gdb_regs fix.i: 00172, Milind Dumbare |
| Next by Thread: | quilt instructions in README: 00172, Jim Blandy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |