|
Re: SMP barriers missing?: msg#00150linux.kernel.debugging.kgdb.bugs
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 12:13:57PM +0530, Amit Kale wrote: > Jim, > > I fully agree that regardless of whether the possibility of kgdb variables > going out of syn is near impossible, we should fix it if we can establish > that it exists. I think we should really try and err on the side of caution and make all of our uses be correct. We are afterall, falling down in a number of ways on SMP today.. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: kgdb 2.3 hangs: 00150, Ming Zhang |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: kgdb 2.3 hangs: 00150, Amit Kale |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: SMP barriers missing?i: 00150, Amit Kale |
| Next by Thread: | Re: SMP barriers missing?: 00150, Amit S. Kale |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |