logo       

Re: Re: [PATCH] arch/ia64/kernel/kgdb.c: msg#00097

linux.kernel.debugging.kgdb.bugs

Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] arch/ia64/kernel/kgdb.c


> Amit Kale wrote: [Wed Jan 11 2006, 01:26:14AM EST]
> > Bob,
> Hi Amit,
> >
> > That would be great.
> Do you want incremental patch against ia64-lite.patch or full
ia64-lite.patch?

Any of them are ok, though an incremental would be better.
-Amit

> I noticed there is one other pending change to ia64 related to
breakpointing.
> I'm very close to satified with my testing. I should be there tonight or
> early tomorrow morning (EST).
> >
> > Thought you were deep burried under a pile of work items. Had a lot
of fun (?)
> > reading ia64 code.
> Well too many work items is my problem.
> > -Amit
> bob
> >
> > On Tuesday 10 Jan 2006 10:13 pm, Bob Picco wrote:
> > > > Appears correct looking at pt_regs, though couldn't figure out
where it
> > > > saves it in ivt.S (me - ia64 newbie :-)
> > > >
> > > > Rest of your fix looks good.
> > >
> > > Sorry about this. I actually have a fix for this and other fixes
> > > in another source tree which is using David Mossberger's libunwind
(unwind
> > > replacement). I was waiting on David to submit libunwind but no longer
> > > will. So I have this fix and several more which will hopefully be
ready in
> > > a day or two. Should I post in time, then we can drop this bug fix.
> > >
> > > bob
> > >
> > > > -Amit
>
>

--



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise