Re: Remove unneeded switch_to stuff

I've checked this in.
Files Changed:
                i386-lite.patch
                ChangeLog
                                
On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 11:35 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 10:27:18AM +0530, Amit Kale wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 Dec 2005 12:10 am, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 05:52:16PM +0530, Amit Kale wrote:
> > > > Attached patch removes unneeded switch_to stuff. Gdb is able to find
> > > > backtraces to schedule correctly now.
> > >
> > > Is this with (a) the previous CFI patch and then (b) GDB fixes?  If so,
> > > lets make sure the GDB fixes are easily found (and in GDB cvs).
> > 
> > This is independent of all other patches we had sent yesterday. This is 
> > continuing a previous thread where George had suggested that switch_to 
> > stuff 
> > was not needed. I had expressed concerns over gdb's ability to find 
> > backtraces in absence of switch_to. gdb-6.3 onwards seems to be able to 
> > handle backtraces starting from switch_to quite well.
> > 
> > Let's get rid of the switch_to stuff. It'll make things easier to push into 
> > mainline linux kernel.
> 
> OK, sounds good then, thanks.
> 
-- 
...Miline
LinSysSoft Technologies
Ask me about KGDB Pro
http://www.linsyssoft.com/Kgdbpro.html



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click