Re: Re: Correct backtraces for do_IRQ

On Tuesday 03 Jan 2006 1:08 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Amit,
>
> >I came across your post to lkml.  It doesn't contain any annotations
>
> for
>
> >do_IRQ. Following part of my patch does that. It lets backtraces go
>
> through
>
> >do_IRQ (when a stack switch is absent).
>
> I can't see that missing. common_interrupt is not a standalone routine;
> the patch adds RING0_INT_FRAME to irq_entries_start, and all the
> necessary annotations to SAVE_ALL. Thus I can't see how your patch would
> even work together with mine. If things aren't working for you with the
> patch I provided, we'd rather have to figure out what's broken with
> that...

Yes. I can see that now. SAVE_ALL macro in your patch contains all the .cfi 
entries I had written after SAVE_ALL.

-Amit

>
> >I guess you were going to try to get segment registers included in
>
> .cfi_offset
>
> >parameters. Any success with that?
>
> Yes, mainline gas meanwhile accepts them.
>
> Jan
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
> files for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Kgdb-bugreport mailing list
> Kgdb-bugreport@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click