|
Re: frontend needed to make Gentoo/embedded a viability: msg#00026linux.gentoo.embedded
Ned Ludd wrote: >> what do you guys think ? stupid idea ? > > Not silly.. I'd tie it into (lx)dialog/Xdialog and skip anything to do > with catalyst as it tends to be cumbersome for embedded use (plus GNAP > already exists). using the classic dialog method will provide the most > familiarity to what buildroot users already expect. Yes, I would stay away from catalyst. GNAP makes extensive uses of it and inherits its design/drawbacks : you'll probably want something smaller and less integrated. Using catalyst you would end up with something like GNAP anyway :P -- Koon |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: frontend needed to make Gentoo/embedded a viability: 00026, Ned Ludd |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Gentoo on handhelds: 00026, Vladimir Pouzanov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: frontend needed to make Gentoo/embedded a viabilityi: 00026, Ned Ludd |
| Next by Thread: | Re: frontend needed to make Gentoo/embedded a viability: 00026, wireless |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |