Re: Kerberos questions

Kerberos 4 support is VERY important... Some of us work at large universities
whose budget/infrastructure doesn't allow for Kerb5 upgrade...

Good work, BTW. :)
--
JR Boyens
jboyens@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 09:13:45AM -0700, Jano Lukac wrote:
> 
> Groovy on the kerberos stuff!  Finally someone else interested in it :)
> 
> Quick thing.. why the skey use?  And isn't kerberos 4 "outdated" now, so
> almost as if saying, "why bother" ?
> 
> Dave Love said:
> <snip>
> 
> > 3. I've then started adding new dependencies for the various
> > utilities, such as cyrus-sasl:
> >
> > dev/libs/cyrus-sasl/cyrus-sasl-1.5.27-r1.ebuild:
> >
> >  DEPEND="... kerberos4? ( virtual/kerberos4 ) kerberos5? (
> >  virtual/kerberos5 )"
> >
> >  src_compile() {
> >    local myconf
> >    use kerberos4 && myconf="${myconf} --enable-krb4"
> >    use kerberos4 || myconf="${myconf} --disable-krb4"
> >    use kerberos5 && myconf="${myconf} --enable-gssapi"
> >    use kerberos5 || myconf="${myconf} --disable-gssapi"
> 
> 
> I think you might be able to shorten this  to the use foo && bar || that,
> but probably kills the readability and might cause a line wrap *shrug*.
> BTW, with the above, I'm assuming you can have both kerberos 4 and 5
> compiled into sasl (but I think I remember you cannot).
> 
> 
> >    ...
> >
> > Am I on the right track here?  It seems to work, but I want to
> > make certain I'm headed in the right direction before I go much
> > further.
> 
> Looks like it.  If kerberos 4 and 5 cannot coexist, then make a single
> virtual depend, or just don't do the virtual depend.
> 
> jano
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
>