|
Re: Kerberos questions: msg#00163linux.gentoo.devel
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 09:13:45AM -0700, Jano Lukac wrote: > > Groovy on the kerberos stuff! Finally someone else interested in it :) > > Quick thing.. why the skey use? And isn't kerberos 4 "outdated" now, so > almost as if saying, "why bother" ? Good question. I'm personally only interested in K5, but since both are included in the portage tree, I figured I might as well deal with both at the same time. The more I get into it though, the more I realize that testing it here is going to be a major pain, so I'll probably just leave the kerberos4 stuff for someone that needs it. The skey stuff is simply to satisfy my own curiousity. <snip> > > use kerberos4 && myconf="${myconf} --enable-krb4" > > use kerberos4 || myconf="${myconf} --disable-krb4" > > use kerberos5 && myconf="${myconf} --enable-gssapi" > > use kerberos5 || myconf="${myconf} --disable-gssapi" > > > I think you might be able to shorten this to the use foo && bar || that, > but probably kills the readability and might cause a line wrap *shrug*. I saw both forms used in various ebuilds and wasn't sure if there was a standard or not, so I just opted for the more legible of the two. > BTW, with the above, I'm assuming you can have both kerberos 4 and 5 > compiled into sasl (but I think I remember you cannot). Enabling k4 and k5 in sasl works just fine here: since I don't have k4 installed, the configure script automatically disabled it. Oops. ;-) Yet another reason to leave the k4 stuff for someone who needs it. > > Am I on the right track here? It seems to work, but I want to > > make certain I'm headed in the right direction before I go much > > further. > > Looks like it. If kerberos 4 and 5 cannot coexist, then make a single > virtual depend, or just don't do the virtual depend. Good point. I think I still need the virtual depend for kerberos5 since it can come from either the heimdal or krb5 packages, but there's no reason to create 2 virtual packages for k4 and k5. So I'm down to virtual/kerberos and the USE flag 'kerberos5'. > jano Thanks for the feedback! - Dave |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Kerberos questions: 00163, Jano Lukac |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Multiple NICs and "need net": 00163, Sean P. Kane |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Kerberos questionsi: 00163, Jano Lukac |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Kerberos questions: 00163, jboyens |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |