|
Re: Yaffs Packed Tags and bad block markings: msg#00034linux.file-systems.yaffs
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 16:55 -0500, Lance Ware wrote: > I am using yaffs2 and i am looking at the arrangement of the extended > tags areas. My question is i have a Samsung chip which uses bad block > markers at the 0 byte of the 64-byte spare area. But when i pass the > extended tags parameter to my nand_write function, the bad block maker > is overwritten with the tag information. What is your nand_write function ? Userspace application ? > I was wondering was their a way to change the arrangement of the bad > block marker. No > Or should i handle this in the mtd-layer. I was wondering what the > layout of the extended tag area supposed to be in the nand spare area. The mtd layer uses a autoplacement scheme, which respects the reserved bytes in the oob area (bad block marker, ECC) tglx |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Yaffs Packed Tags and bad block markings: 00034, Lance Ware |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Yaffs Packed Tags and bad block markings: 00034, Thomas Gleixner |
| Previous by Thread: | Yaffs Packed Tags and bad block markingsi: 00034, Lance Ware |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Yaffs Packed Tags and bad block markings: 00034, Thomas Gleixner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |