Re: stability

Hi, David:
     Would you like to tell me which Kernel version did you use?
     If you are using 2.6.0-test9 , you can try the patch attached.
I'm doing my effort to make it better.
     Thanks.
--
     Yang, Chen
     
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Masover" <jedi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <intermezzo-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 1:48 AM
Subject: stability

Recently I was asked to set up two webservers in such a way that either 
one could fail and the other would take over -- in other words, simple 
high-availability.  Intermezzo seemed perfect, except that it had a big 
flaming warning about how experimental the software was.

Intermezzo has been "experimental" for how long now?  Seems like it 
should be stable by now.  I tried it, and had a problem (similar to one 
described on the list, apparently) of simple programs like "touch" 
segfaulting, subsequent mount/umount and killall intersync attempts 
going into uninterruptable sleep, and kernel oopses.  On some test of 
2.6, with the latest (gentoo) version of intersync.  Have things gotten 
better since then?

patch
Description: Binary data