Re: linux-cifs-client Digest, Vol 37, Issue 18

> On Sat, 23 Dec 2006, Ian McDonald wrote:
>   
> > Well I can compile it OK and link now so that's better.
> >     
>
> No, as far as I'm concerned, compiling and linking is actually _worse_ if
> the end result then causes horrible problems.
>
> Which is why I'll leave it in the non-compiling stage in the standard
> kernel until I actually get somebody reporting whether the end result
> actually works or not (or an ACK from a CIFS person).
>
>   
> > I don't know really how to test but I'll tell you if CIFS interferes
> > with my daschund.
> >     
>
> Remember to send pictures.
>
>                 Linus
>
>
>   

I am looking at the patch now, and it makes sense - but may also want to 
run it by Shaggy who probably wrote this section of
cifs_writepages originally.