|
Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.20: msg#00010linux.file-systems.cifs
On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 12:32:05 -0600 Steve French <smfltc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > akpm wrote: > >deprecate-smbfs-in-favour-of-cifs.patch > >deprecate-smbfs-in-favour-of-cifs-docs.patch > > > > Am still waiting to hear from sfrench on the appropriateness of this. > > > smbfs deprecation is ok but there are a few things to consider: OK, thanks for the update. We would like to make smbfs go away asap, but from my POV it's up to you to say when we should do that. otoh, it might be a good idea to merge a variant of that patch which doesn't mention a specific data. Say, if (warn_count < 5) { warn_count++; printk(KERN_EMERG "smbfs is not being maintained." " Please migrate to cifs\n"); } ? > > ... > > Running simple tests on smbfs, I run into so many problems now though, it > is probably time to mark it as deprecated as Fedora etc. apparently > already have. No, smbfs is not in very good shape. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Corrupted data on write to Windows 2003 Server: 00010, Danny Sung |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | In a lab test, the sperm from each smoker was exposed to half of an egg for two or three hours.: 00010, Liz Cabrera |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.20i: 00010, Steve French |
| Next by Thread: | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.20: 00010, Chuck Ebbert |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |